US supreme court rules Trump’s firing of Lisa Cook from Fed was unconstitutional
Lisa Cook at the Economic Club of Miami earlier this month. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenLisa Cook at the Economic Club of Miami earlier this month. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty ImagesUS supreme courtUS supreme court rules Trump’s firing of Lisa Cook from Fed was unconstitutionalJustices find president does not have constitutional authority to fire Federal Reserve governor without cause The US supreme court has refused Donald Trump’s attempts to immediately fire a Federal Reserve governor, in a landmark ruling that limits a president’s authority over the central bank. In a 5-4 opinion, the court said that Lisa Cook can stay on as a governor while she fights unproved allegations of mortgage fraud made by the Trump officials. “The court decides this application on the narrow ground that the president failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute. Without such protections, she could not properly dispute the charges the president laid against her,” the justices said. The case was centered on Cook, a Joe Biden appointee whose 14-year term on the Federal Reserve board of governors is scheduled to expire in 2038. Cook is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board. Last August, on social media, Trump abruptly fired Cook. The president claimed he had evidence that Cook committed mortgage fraud, an illegal practice where a homebuyer lists a second property as a primary resident to obtain a better mortgage rate. Cook denied the allegations and sued the Trump administration, saying it fired her without cause. The justices’ protection over the Fed decision is a departure from how the court has handled Trump in his second term, allowing the president broad power to carry out his agenda without congressional approval. On Monday, the court also ruled that Trump had the authority to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission, who was removed from her position before her term ended. The court has also allowed Trump to remove a Democratic-appointed member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), leaving the powerful union board without a quorum needed to decide on labor disputes. The court also stripped lower district courts of their power to issue nationwide injunctions, which was often used to block Trump in his first administration, and stayed a lower court’s ruling that restricted Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s (ICE) from using race and ethnicity as the basis for reasonable suspicion in immigration enforcement. But the court seems determined to protect the Fed. The ruling is a major win for the central bank, which has spent the last year under attack from the White House. Over the past year, most Fed officials have broadly ignored demands of loyalty from Trump, who believes interest rates should be lower. Trump has attacked the Fed for holding interest rates at levels he believes are too high and are stifling the economy. The independence of the Fed is widely regarded as sacrosanct, but Trump has continued to press for the central bank to follow his will. Much of his ire over the last year has been directed at Jerome Powell, a Fed governor and former Fed chair who Trump first appointed in 2018. In January, the justice department placed Powell under investigation, purportedly over testimony he gave last summer about renovations at the Fed’s headquarters that went over budget.