North America
CNBC Finance

Boom in tech wealth is fueling record prices for dinosaur bones, art and watches, auction houses say

The major auction houses racked up nearly $10 billion in sales in the first half, marking one of the strongest-ever starts to the year as the wealthy gained confidence from soaring financial stock markets. Sotheby's reported its best first half ever, with $4.4 billion in sales, up 58% from last year and marking a record for the 282-year-old auction house. Christie's had its best first half since 2021, reporting sales of $4.5 billion, up 71%. Phillips, Heritage and other auctioneers also had breakout starts to the year. There were eight lots that sold for more than $50 million in the first half, compared with none in 2024 and 2025, according to Artnet. Auction executives and dealers say the explosive rebound in the art market, following nearly three years of declines, is being driven largely by the massive wealth creation from the artificial intelligence boom, IPOs and rising stocks. "The numbers mean there is confidence in the market," Christie's CEO Bonnie Brennan said at the Christie's Art + Tech Summit last week. "There are people willing to sell great objects and there are people spending great amounts of money to acquire those special one-of-one works." Added Sotheby's CEO Charles Stewart: "The wealth being created now is the number one factor in our business right now. It's obviously very visible when you sit here in New York and talk about the SpaceX IPO and these different tech IPOs coming and the AI fever." While the dollar totals are being driven largely by a select group of hyper-priced works at the very top of the market, the strength is across the board, in almost all price points and almost every category. Fine art, classic cars, watches, handbags, diamonds, whiskey and even dinosaur bones are all seeing new records. Leading the first half was a Jackson Pollock drip painting, titled "Number 7A, 1948," which sold for $181 million at Christie's. The work, considered one of Pollock's most epic and defining works, had previously been owned by media magnate and collector S.I. Newhouse, which added to its appeal. A Brancusi sculpture also previously owned by Newhouse went for $107.6 million. A new wave of younger collectors, many from the tech world, is also redefining collectibles. In classic cars, 1950s and 1960s sports cars used to dominate the price charts. Now supercars from the 1990s and 2000s are the hottest sellers. Watches are gaining in popularity among tech bros. Phillips in Association with Bacs & Russo reported $235 million in watch auctions in the first half, marking its largest ever. The strong bidding stretched across its auctions in New York, Geneva and Hong Kong. While Patek Philippe remains strong, young collectors are battling over pieces from more rarified, independent brands. The priciest watch sold in the first half was an F.P. Journe Souscription Résonance, which went for $13.9 million. Mark Zuckerberg has become one of the most high-profile devotees of F.P. Journe in recent years, and has sported seven-figure F.P. Journes in public. Brennan said 30% of the buyers in the first half were new to Christie's, with 47% of them millennials or younger, and that 85% of bids were placed online.

Boom in tech wealth is fueling record prices for dinosaur bones, art and watches, auction houses say
Europe
BBC Business

Is it safe to travel to France and Spain right now?

Wildfires in Spain and France have caused mass evacuation and disruption, with more than 300,000 people forced to leave their homes and many sleeping in sports halls and other temporary shelters. An official from one of the French departments affected by the fires has pleaded with visitors to stay away. On Sunday, Sophie Brocas, prefect of the French department of Gironde, said, "I urge tourists not to come," while advising those already there to consider an alternative destination. For those who have upcoming holidays to the affected regions, here is what you should know about how it might impact your plans. The UK government has not specifically warned against travel to anywhere in France or Spain, but it does advise caution. In France, it says access to affected areas may be restricted and roads may close at short notice. It adds that further evacuations may take place. It has also issued a general warning about the high risk of wildfires in France during the summer season from April to October. For those in an affected area in France or Spain or planning to travel there, the UK government recommends following instructions and updates from local authorities and emergency services at all times. Travellers should also bear in mind the UK government's advice can and does change in response to moving events. Anna-Marie Duthie, travel insurance expert at financial rating firm Defaqto, says that if this happens after you have booked your trip, "you may be covered for cancellation or curtailment". "You may also be covered for additional travel and accommodation costs should your trip be disrupted due to a catastrophic event, if your insurer offers this cover or you've paid to include it," she adds. The UK government says parts of Gironde and Landes in the south west of France are affected.

Is it safe to travel to France and Spain right now?
Europe
BBC Business

Cracker Barrel chief executive steps down a year after rebrand chaos

Image source, Getty ImagesByFrancisco VelasquezBusiness reporter, Reporting fromNew YorkPublished27 July 2026Cracker Barrel's chief executive is quitting a year after the company faced a widespread backlash over its controversial rebrand. The restaurant chain said on Monday Julie Masino will leave in August, with the former boss of Bloomin' Brands, David Deno, taking over. Its rebrand sparked a national controversy, with critics including President Trump, who urged the chain to restore its original logo after critics accused it of abandoning its heritage. Masino did not issue a statement about her resignation, but Cracker Barrel's management thanked her for her tenure. Masino will be paid an estimated $4.6m as part of a departure package, according to the company's 8-K filing, external. Cracker Barrel declined to comment, referring the BBC instead to the filing. The leadership change comes after a turbulent period for the business, which runs nearly 660 country-themed store and restaurants sites across 44 US states. Plans to simplify the classic logo and modernise store interiors sparked fierce resistance from loyal diners who argued the changes stripped away the brand's nostalgic Southern charm. It follows a similar uproar in 2022 when Cracker Barrel faced online backlash from some customers after adding plant-based sausages to its breakfast menu. Such controversies highlight the delicate balance facing brands hoping to attract younger audiences without alienating their core, longstanding customer base. Critics described the latest rebrand as "soulless" and "generic". Jo-Ellen Pozner, an associate professor at Santa Clara University's Leavey School of Business, said the leadership swap "seems to reflect the polarization many Americans feel today". She added that doubling down on conservative values may help win back vocal loyalists but "paints the company into a corner". "Changing anything about the menu, decor, or branding at this point is dangerous, so there are few levers to attract new customers," Pozner said.

Cracker Barrel chief executive steps down a year after rebrand chaos
Europe
BBC Business

Trump vows to investigate EU over fining of US tech companies

Image source, ReutersImage caption, US President Donald Trump has taken issue with European regulators in the past. Donald Trump says the US will launch an investigation into the European Union and threatened a fresh tariff over fines handed to some of the biggest American tech companies. It comes days after the European Commission fined Google €890m ($1bn) for operating in a way that squeezed out competitors to its services. In a post to Truth Social, which Trump owns, the US president said the EU would pay a "very big price" over how it had treated Google, along with other major US tech companies Apple, Meta, and Amazon, which have also been investigated. Trump said any fines should be "entirely reversed" and that he was initiating a trade investigation of the EU while considering "a substantial TARIFF". He added that the US would "immediately initiate a 301 investigation" over European regulators' alleged practice of "robbing American companies and, in turn, the American taxpayer". Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, external gives The Office of the United States Trade Representative the power to react and investigate trade practices believed to be unfair. The second Trump Administration has launched several such investigations, external since last year. The tariff threat comes just one day after Trump announced new tariffs on 60 trading partners, including the EU, UK and China, of between 10% and 12.5%. Trump also last month threatened a 100% import tariff on any European country that introduces a digital services tax on American technology giants, despite many such nations already doing so, external for years. Major tech companies, including Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon, have donated millions of dollars to funds behind Trump's campaign and presidency. José Castañeda, a spokesman for Google, told the BBC the company had "worked hard to comply" with Europe's Digital Markets Act but had "expressed our concerns about the impact of recent EC decisions". "We appreciate the engagement by the administration and US government," Castañeda added.

Trump vows to investigate EU over fining of US tech companies
Europe
The Guardian

Cracker Barrel CEO to step down after overseeing logo backlash last year

Julie Felss Masino, president and CEO of Cracker Barrel, speaks during 13D Monitor’s Active-Passive Investor Summit in New York City on 21 October 2025. Photograph: Jeenah Moon/ReutersView image in fullscreenJulie Felss Masino, president and CEO of Cracker Barrel, speaks during 13D Monitor’s Active-Passive Investor Summit in New York City on 21 October 2025. Photograph: Jeenah Moon/ReutersBusinessCracker Barrel CEO to step down after overseeing logo backlash last yearJulie Masino faced criticism as restaurant chain was called ‘woke’ and ‘soulless’ after unveiling modernized logo Cracker Barrel’s CEO, Julie Masino, is stepping down, the restaurant announced on Monday, nearly a year after the company was swept into a political maelstrom over proposed modernizations to its branding. Critics on social media denounced the Tennessee-based rustic restaurant chain as “woke” as well as “sterile and soulless” after it unveiled an updated logo that removed Uncle Herschel, the overall-clad man leaning against a barrel in the restaurant’s original logo, last August. Donald Trump weighed in on the updates soon after, posting: “WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel?!” and demanding on social media that the company “admit a mistake”. The company announced that it would revert back to its old logo soon after the social media reaction exploded. Masino, who has served as the chain’s CEO since 2023, told the rightwing commentator Glenn Beck in December that she felt “fired by America” after the controversy. Cracker Barrel’s stock dropped nearly 3% after the announcement of Masino’s departure. The chain’s new CEO, David Deno, will take over on 10 August, and Masino will remain until October to help with the transition. “Cracker Barrel is a truly iconic American brand, defined by its unique combination of warm country hospitality, timeless appeal, and deep connection with guests across generations,” Deno said in a statement. Masino’s departure the latest fallout from social media-fueled backlash against brands accused of appealing to certain political ideals. The Harris Poll found last year that a quarter of Americans have changed their shopping habits to align with their morals, with 50% of Democrats and 41% of Republicans responding that they stopped shopping at stores opposing their political views. Some companies have quickly felt the financial strain of these calls to action. In 2023, after Target announced a pride month collection and Bud Light aired an advertisement with a transgender influencer, both companies announced declines in sales. On the other side of the political aisle, Target was pulled as a sponsor from Minneapolis’s annual pride festival last year after it announced it was ending its diversity, equality and inclusion policies. Not all of these boycotts have been successful, though – Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey saw great success at its global box office debut, despite Elon Musk and other critics castigating the movie’s cast as part of a “woke” agenda. Cracker Barrel has had a history of discriminatory treatment against diners and staff. In 1991, the chain blocked the hiring of LGBTQ+ workers and dismissed 11 staff members, though it later backed down from that policy. In 2004, Cracker Barrel paid $8.7m to settle discrimination allegations from Black customers who said they were denied service and Black employees who said they received more “back of house” assignments compared with their white counterparts.

Cracker Barrel CEO to step down after overseeing logo backlash last year
Europe
BBC Business

Johnson & Johnson offers up to $5.5bn to settle baby powder lawsuits

Image source, Getty ImagesByOsmond ChiaBusiness reporterPublished28 July 2026, 02:24 BSTUpdated 2 hours agoJohnson & Johnson (J&J) has offered to pay as much as $5.5bn (£4.14bn) to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits in the US alleging that its baby powder and other products containing talcum cause ovarian cancer. The proposed landmark settlement aims to close a long-running legal battle that has weighed on the New Jersey-based healthcare giant for years. J&J has denied that its talc-based products caused cancer and has changed the formula of its widely used baby powder. Erik Haas, the firm's vice president of litigation said on Monday, external that the allegations are "meritless" and that J&J was willing to settle in order to finally resolve the matter. J&J said the settlement would cover about 69,000 cases, totalling most of the remaining talc-related claims. The firm will offer up to $3bn next year, with no additional payments due before 2028, it said. The proposal must be accepted by legal firms representing 95% of the ovarian cancer claims in state and federal courts before it can be finalised, the J&J said. Haas said in a statement that the company is confident that it would have "ultimately prevailed with further litigation" just as it has in the majority of cases heard in court to date. He added that the proposed resolution "allows the company to put this matter behind it" and enable J&J to "remain focused on its mission to develop medicines and devices that save lives". J&J's former consumer health business, Kenvue, holds liability for Johnson's baby powder outside North America. Kenvue - which owns well-known brands including Band-Aid, Listerine, and Calpol - was spun off from J&J in 2022. Earlier in July, a federal court handed the firm a victory by questioning individual plaintiffs' ability to show that talc was the direct cause of their ovarian cancer. Talc is a natural mineral made of magnesium, silicon, oxygen and hydrogen, known for its soapy feel and is often used in baby powder.

Johnson & Johnson offers up to $5.5bn to settle baby powder lawsuits
Europe
BBC Business

Faisal Islam: The UK's Trump trade deal no longer looks world-beating

Image source, Getty ImagesByFaisal IslamEconomics editorPublished24 July 2026It has been a long road for President Donald Trump as he looks for a justification to erect a tariff wall around the US, including against key allies. From the opioid crisis to illegal migration, then the need to bring manufacturing back to America's shores, the list goes on. Through Trump's second term, there has been a new justification almost every month for the trade levies he is seeking to place on allies. Some have been overturned by the courts, others by economics and some even by their own logic. And so, Trump has now turned to effectively accusing dozens of trade partners of trading in goods that have been produced using forced labour. These are "tariffs in search of an authority", as one industry figure put it. The forced labour line shores up President Trump's tariffs against a challenge from Congress or the courts. In practice, the levies are curiously similar by country to a previous round of tariffs imposed supposedly for completely different reasons. The good news for the UK is that the regime effectively remains the same as before. What has changed is that our nearest neighbours in the European Union now have a much better deal than before, and in turn are in a better situation than the UK. While the UK and the EU each appear to have a 10% rate, the EU's is a flat rate, while the UK's will apply alongside other tariffs, in a range of goods including footwear and textiles. The government has struck effective side deals on medicines, steel, aluminium, cars and, with the help of King Charles, whisky. At the end of this process however the overall trade-weighted effective tariff rate for the EU (8.5%) could end up a bit lower than the UK's (6.8%). It should not matter that much, but the help given by doing the first deal, and by post-Brexit trade freedoms, looks to have been short-lived.

Faisal Islam: The UK's Trump trade deal no longer looks world-beating
North America
CNBC Finance

EU antitrust regulators clear Paramount-WBD merger as it faces challenge by U.S. states

European Union antitrust regulators said on Wednesday they had signed off on Paramount Skydance's proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The approval, which included concessions made by Paramount, comes as the deal has been delayed in the U.S. due to concerns raised by state attorneys general. In order to garner the approval, the European Commission, the executive body of the EU, said Paramount agreed to divest its stake in a film distribution joint venture with United International Pictures in Europe, and said it would not enter into any film distribution deal with Universal for the next 10 years in Europe. "These commitments fully address the competition concerns identified by the Commission by ensuring that the films of the merged entity will not be distributed jointly with those Universal or Disney," according to the EU's release. The EU's approval marks a major regulatory milestone for the $110 billion proposed merger. The deal earlier won approval from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Various other global jurisdictions have also signed off on the deal. "With the clearance from the European Commission, bodies and governments representing 65 jurisdictions have either cleared the transaction or chosen not to challenge it on competition and/or foreign direct investment grounds," Paramount said in a release on Wednesday. "These clearances recognize that the combination of Paramount and WBD will enhance consumer choice and enable a creative-first company to invest in more projects and bring stories to audiences worldwide," Paramount said in its statement. "It will create a scaled media and entertainment company capable of competing with the tech companies that have come to dominate the industry, strengthening the media ecosystem and creating more opportunities for creatives both in front of and behind the camera." The clearance comes as a lawsuit brought forward by a group of U.S. state attorneys general last week has become a potential holdup in this deal moving forward. The coalition led by California's Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit seeking to block the merger due to antitrust concerns. The tie-up is set to combine two major film studios, Paramount and Warner Bros., a massive portfolio of pay TV networks, and streaming services HBO Max and Paramount+. Earlier this week a California district judge granted a temporary restraining order that puts a 14-day pause on anything moving forward with the merger. "The conclusions reached by the European Commission directly refute key assumptions that underpin the state AGs' complaint seeking to block the transaction," Paramount said in its release.

EU antitrust regulators clear Paramount-WBD merger as it faces challenge by U.S. states
North America
Yahoo Finance

The Average Social Security Check Is $2,082. Your Bills Didn’t Get the Memo. These 4 ETFs Step In

A $2,082 monthly benefit works out to roughly $25,000 a year. The average household spends more than three times that. Even a 1.68% national average 12-month CD barely covers the rounding error on your grocery bill. You need cash flowing every month, and you need at least one holding that grows faster than inflation so your future self is not stuck in the same corner. These four funds attack that problem from four different angles. SPYI owns the S&P 500 and layers a call-option strategy on top to generate premium income. The fund has grown to roughly $6.9 billion in net assets and carries an expense ratio of 0.68%, meaning you keep about $9,932 of every $10,000 working for you each year. It pays monthly. The July 2026 distribution was $0.53 per share, and the fund has paid out $6.31 per share over the trailing 12 months, with a forward annualized rate of $6.36. On a recent price of $52.26, that is a high-single-digit yield that lands in your account every month. The tradeoff is participation. Covered calls cap upside, so SPYI gained 15.71% over the past year while SPY returned 16.41%. You are trading a slice of appreciation for a fatter monthly check. For a retiree, that is often the right trade. HDV holds $13.57 billion in older, cash-generating names. The top of the book reads like a retiree’s shopping list: Exxon Mobil at 8.42%, Chevron at 6.43%, Johnson & Johnson at 5.68%, AbbVie at 5.44%, and Procter & Gamble at 4.46%. Energy, healthcare, consumer staples, and utilities dominate. Those sectors sell things people buy in every economic weather. The fund is also pulling its weight on total return, up 22.41% over the past year and 18.70% year to date. Concentration is real: the top 10 holdings represent roughly 51.8% of assets, so a bad quarter for Big Oil can sting. PFFD holds more than 200 preferred stock positions across roughly $2.25 billion in assets. Preferreds sit above common stock in the capital stack and typically pay fixed distributions. Translation: less growth, more predictable income. PFFD has paid $0.10 per share every month in 2026, for a $1.20 annualized rate on a share price of $18.39. That is a mid-single-digit yield delivered like clockwork. Top exposures include Boeing at 4.64%, Albemarle at 3.00%, and heavy positions across Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan, and NextEra Energy. Preferreds move with interest rates, which is why PFFD is up just 0.38% year to date. You are buying it for the coupon. DGRW screens U.S. companies for return on equity, return on assets, and expected dividend growth. Its monthly distributions have compounded into real numbers: a trailing 12-month payout of $1.22 per share and a $1.92 forward annualized rate. The share price sits at $95, and total return has been the point: up 12.20% over one year, 69.02% over five years, and 252.88% over 10 years. That is the fund whose job is to keep your purchasing power ahead of the CPI. None of these funds are riskless. SPYI’s covered calls will lag in a raging bull market. HDV concentrates in a handful of mega-caps. PFFD moves with interest rates and can drift sideways for years. DGRW pays the smallest current yield of the four. Owned together, though, they cover the bases a Social Security check cannot: monthly cash flow, defensive dividends, fixed-rate income, and long-term growth. For a retiree watching bills outrun a 2.8% COLA, that combination is worth the homework.

The Average Social Security Check Is $2,082. Your Bills Didn’t Get the Memo. These 4 ETFs Step In