North America
CNBC Finance

Trump administration removes around 760,000 Obamacare enrollments, alleging fraud

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said on Tuesday it canceled roughly 315,000 Affordable Care Act marketplace enrollments covering about 760,000 people last month, alleging unauthorized enrollments, characterized by Vice President JD Vance as "rampant fraud." The enforcement action also involves verifying roughly 419,000 people to ensure they are legal U.S. residents and meet the income threshold requirements to receive benefits from the public exchanges of the ACA, also known as Obamacare, according to a CMS release. The vice president's White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud led the cancellations, and it estimates the action will save roughly $2.2 billion in taxpayer-funded subsidies. Speaking at a Tuesday briefing, Vance accused the Biden administration of maintaining a system that enabled fraud. "You have a system where, on the one hand, brokers are paid money to feed patients into the system, while on the other hand, the government isn't even checking whether the people enrolled are actually eligible for the program. What do you have? Of course, rampant, rampant fraud," Vance said. It is unclear how many of those 315,000 enrollments involved people who were not eligible to receive coverage, or whether the Biden administration hadn't actually verified they could enroll. The action comes as the Trump administration has made widespread accusations of fraud in U.S. health programs and restricted funding and eligibility for the federal-state Medicaid program. During the briefing Tuesday, CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz claimed that around 35% of people currently in the Obamacare system "have never used the program." He said those people never used a prescription or saw a doctor. The law has an individual mandate, or requirement that most people buy insurance, in part because having healthier people who use less care in the patient pool makes the system more affordable. However, the federal penalty for going without coverage has been $0 since 2019. Obamacare plans, created by President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, offer subsidies based on household size and estimated yearly income. President Donald Trump failed to overturn the legislation during his first term, but has proposed modifications that would make those insurance plans less comprehensive. Oz argued that bad actors were attracted to ACA marketplace subsidies during the Covid-19 pandemic, when federal spending surged dramatically. He pointed to enrollment growth from about 10 million people before the pandemic to roughly 22 million after, arguing that weakened safeguards and a lack of enforcement by the Biden administration contributed to improper enrollments. Obamacare plans experienced "unprecedented enrollment growth from 2021 to 2024," according to a June report from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, the principal advisor to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services on policy development. The report said of this enrollment that "nearly half ... was suspected to be improper, phantom, or fraudulent." The report defined improper or fraudulent enrollment as individuals misstating their income to gain access to free plans. The spike in enrollment came after the American Rescue Plan, a Covid response bill passed in 2021, enhanced available subsidies to make healthcare more affordable during the crisis. Those broader credits were extended but later expired at the end of 2025, raising premiums for many covered by ACA exchanges. An estimated 19.2 million Americans are currently enrolled in Obamacare plans, according to the report.

Trump administration removes around 760,000 Obamacare enrollments, alleging fraud
Europe
BBC Business

Burnham to unveil public body to invest in electricity grid

Image source, Jeff Overs/BBCByAlex Forsyth, Political correspondent, Reporting fromLiverpool, Paul Seddon and Jennifer McKiernanPublished29 September 2026, 00:35 BSTUpdated 3 hours agoAndy Burnham is expected to announce a new government body to invest in Britain's electricity grid in his first party conference speech as Labour leader on Tuesday. The prime minister will tell party activists in Liverpool that the new publicly owned company, branded Great British Grid, will speed up grid hook-ups by driving up competition for connection projects. Burnham is expected to put the proposals at the heart of a new goal to bring UK energy costs in line with other nations in Europe within ten years. He will promise to have an "honest conversation" with the public and take on the "difficult issues" that have been ignored for too long. Burnham is expected to bill the creation of the GB Grid as the first significant move in his ambition to provide greater public control of utilities, which he put at the centre of his pitch for power over the summer. He is expected to say that faster connections to the electricity grid could help fix a "cost crisis" in energy that has proved "crippling for businesses". Full details of the new body are yet to be set out, but Labour said it would invest in and compete for transmission connection projects alongside the three private companies that currently own and manage the grid in Britain. The party said it would also make it easier for firms waiting to be connected to the grid to finance connection infrastructure themselves, with GB Grid supporting and potentially co-investing in projects alongside them. Labour has said that funding for the new body will be found within the existing budget of GB Energy, the public green investment company set up by Labour last year and which is now headquartered in Aberdeen. The transition of electricity generation from large fossil fuel stations to the more remote locations used for renewables, such as offshore windfarms, will require Britain's ageing transmission grid to undergo extensive rewiring in coming years. Energy regulator Ofgem has estimated that £70bn of investment is required in the grid between 2025 and 2031, quadrupling the current rate of investment. But in a report earlier this month, the National Audit Office warned that the number of projects waiting to connect to the grid had grown "significantly" whilst delays to projects were also increasing.

Burnham to unveil public body to invest in electricity grid
North America
Yahoo Finance

Can a 6% Dividend Yield Really Last? Here’s What History Says

A 6% dividend yield sounds like an income investor's dream, but the same number that makes a stock look attractive can signal something far more troubling beneath the surface. Knowing the difference before you buy could save your portfolio from… This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them. As soon as anyone hears the words “6% yield,” it’s going to grab a lot of attention, and for the right reasons. This is a strong return for most investors who want to generate real income and growth from a portfolio over time. This number gets even more appealing when you look at the average S&P 500 yield right now, which is sitting around 1.05%, so the opportunity to generate four times more than what the S&P is doing is undoubtedly appealing. The challenge with hearing this yield number is that you really need to make sure you are aware of what you are getting for the yield. There are red flags that investors should be aware of, and knowing them isn’t just something to think about in passing, but they might be vital pieces of information before you start putting money into an investment. For the most part, calculating a dividend yield is pretty easy to do, as you only have to take the annual dividend and divide it by the share price. It’s pretty simple to calculate, but the reality is that a company can raise its dividend payout, something just about every investor loves to see. However, if the share price falls, it pushes the yield higher automatically without the company having to do anything. There is another scenario, which is usually the one that 6% dividends originate from, and it’s something that you have to scrutinize a little bit more. If a stock drops, especially quickly, it’s because the market has already started pricing in something wrong beneath the surface. The rising yield is likely more a symptom of a problem, and it isn’t necessarily a reason to make a stock purchase. The moment you start digging deeper into what dividend sustainability can look like, there is a better-than-good chance you’ll wind up with the same conclusion each time. Yields that sit above the broader market tend to get cut at a higher rate as yields move closer to what would be considered “normal” levels. To be fair, this isn’t a hard rule, but it does give us something to consider, as the companies that are paying out 6% or more of their share price are often doing it at the very edge of what their cash flow levels can actually support. What tells the real story is the payout ratio, and a company that is paying out 90% of its earnings as dividends is often the same company that doesn’t have much of a cushion. All it takes is one bad quarter, one interest rate move, or one unexpected capital expense, and a dividend cut happens, and investors are furious. A company that is only paying out 50% of its earnings has far more room to absorb a bad quarter or capital expense without impacting its dividend. The yield alone won’t tell an investor anything about a situation they are actually looking at, which takes us to the second scenario. The second potential situation is the one where most 6% yields do come from, and it’s the one worth considering the most. If a stock falls drastically, then it is most probably due to the market having started pricing in the troubles behind the scenes, which is what will cause an increase in the yield. There will no doubt be questions about high yields and any skepticism around these numbers would be fair, but there are some exceptions that should make the doubters feel better. Some sectors, like REITs, for example, carry structurally higher yields, and it has nothing to do with the company being in any kind of trouble. Instead, these companies are required, by law, to distribute roughly 90% of their taxable income. In other words, not only is an elevated yield normal, it’s just how it works. The same goes for Business Development Companies, which operate under the same kind of rules of needing to distribute taxable income. For their part, MLPs in energy infrastructure also have historically supported higher payouts through long-term contracted cash flow and not earnings that can swing in either direction based on the market. It always needs to be said that strong businesses that operate in stable industries can also support higher yields. Take a utility company that has regulated revenue and decades of consistent cash generation, which might have a similar 6% yield number as an REIT or BDC, but everything underneath is different.

Can a 6% Dividend Yield Really Last? Here’s What History Says
North America
CNBC Finance

Coca-Cola hires Rob Gehring from Monster Energy to run its North American operations

Rob Gehring, the head of Monster Energy's Americas business, will leave to run Coca-Cola's North America unit, the companies said Friday. The move comes as Coke tries to maintain growth while U.S. consumers cut back on spending in the face of higher gas and grocery prices. Despite those dynamics, the beverage giant posted net sales growth of 7% in the second quarter, as volume — a key measure of demand — rose 3% in North America. Though Monster Energy parent Monster Beverage is considerably smaller than Coke, its sales have soared in part due to innovation in the energy drink space. The company reported net sales growth of 20% in its second quarter. Coke is also investing in developing new beverages beyond its core soda offerings, including refreshers and dirty sodas. Gehring, 59, took on his previous role at Monster in February after serving as chief growth officer since 2024. In a press release, Coke said he was "part of the leadership team that drove the company's growth agenda and modernized commercial capabilities." Coke shares have climbed more than 25% this year, while Monster's stock has risen more than 12%. Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Coca-Cola hires Rob Gehring from Monster Energy to run its North American operations
Europe
BBC Business

What a US diesel export ban could mean for you

Image source, Getty ImagesByFrancisco VelasquezBusiness reporterPublished9 hours agoUS President Donald Trump has said he would back a ban on diesel producers selling overseas as surging fuel prices hit drivers ahead of the midterm elections. Diesel prices are hovering near a record $6.45 per gallon on average, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA), due to the ongoing US-Israel war with Iran and tight global supplies. Trump and his backers say a US diesel export ban would protect domestic consumers from those rising costs, but experts say it could trigger major economic waves both at home and across the world if it were to happen. The US is one of the world's leading energy producers, with domestic refineries churning out roughly four to five million barrels of diesel every day, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Americans consume about 3.6 million barrels of that daily output. Refiners export the remaining1.2 to 1.5 million barrels per day, making the US a vital supplier to the global market. Between 60% and 70% of this exported fuel goes to Latin America. Nations like Mexico, Brazil, Chile, and Ecuador depend heavily on American shipments to power their transport, farming, and factory sectors. Significant volumes also head across the Atlantic to European countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK, as buyers search for alternatives to Middle Eastern supplies. US diesel prices have climbed to a record high of over $6.50 per gallon – up nearly 70% year-on-year. The spike has been driven by broader energy market shocks tied to ongoing conflict with Iran, which has restricted critical shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway south of Iran through which one fifth of the world's oil and gas usually flows. Diesel primarily fuels commercial vehicles in the US – such as freight trucks, farm machinery, and cargo trains – which are used for transporting goods and construction. This means higher diesel prices can drive up the price of food, building projects, and many other things. Outside the US, diesel is used in both commercial and consumer vehicles, but the effects of higher prices are similar.

What a US diesel export ban could mean for you
North America
CNBC Finance

Airlines waive change fees ahead of nor'easter as flight delays trickle in

U.S. airlines waived change fees for flights Friday through Sunday ahead of a nor'easter that federal forecasters warn will bring high winds and rainfall with the potential for dangerous flooding. As of Friday afternoon, close to 600 flights to and from LaGuardia Airport in New York were delayed, more than half the schedule, according to FlightAware. Dozens of others were delayed at major New England and New York-area airports. Carriers will often cancel a chunk, if not most of their schedules, during severe winter storms or hurricanes to ensure planes, passengers and crews aren't out of place, but airlines are still assessing the nor'easter's potential path and impact. American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and JetBlue Airways said customers can change their flights for a host of airports in the New York City area, Boston and smaller New England airports, without paying a change fee or difference in fare if they can fly anytime before the middle of next week. The potential weekend disruptions come after an equipment outage on Monday forced carriers to cancel hundreds of flights bound for the New York area and Philadelphia. Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Airlines waive change fees ahead of nor'easter as flight delays trickle in
Asia
The Hindu BusinessLine

Rupee ends flat, anchored by RBI intervention in face of global strains

The Indian rupee ended little changed on Monday, wedged between pressures from a broadly firmer dollar, higher oil prices and likely intervention by the Reserve Bank of India, which kept the currency moored in a thin trading range. The rupee closed at 96.2925 per dollar, barely changed from its close at 96.3150 in the previous session. The dollar started the week on firm footing, hovering near a 17-month high on Monday. The greenback was boosted by weakness in the euro amid worries over France’s fiscal situation, and knocked Asian currencies 0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent lower. Crude oil prices, meanwhile, nudged up to nearly $103 per barrel. Though West Asian exports have increased, concerns about ongoing war-related disruption are keeping prices elevated, an ever-present threat to India’s energy import-dependent economy. The lingering pressures have left the rupee reliant on central bank interventions to avert testing record low levels hit in May. Persistently high levels of hedging by importers, combined with reticence from exporters to enter the market, have also pressured the South Asian currency. Between January and September, importers booked $576.6 billion in forward hedges, far exceeding $305.6 billion by exporters, per clearing house data. On trade policy, India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Monday that talks between India and the United States have reached a plateau and further concessions might be difficult. The focus is now on the Reserve Bank of India’s monetary policy decision on Wednesday, where market participants widely expect a 25 basis point increase in benchmark rates. “While the inflation shock is largely supply-driven, we expect the RBI to raise rates to prevent inflation expectations from de-anchoring,” Deepali Bhargava, Regional Head of Research for Asia-Pacific at ING, said in a note. “Markets will be focused on the RBI’s guidance on the extent and duration of the tightening cycle.” Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments. We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

Rupee ends flat, anchored by RBI intervention in face of global strains
Asia
The Hindu BusinessLine

Broker’s call: FSN E-Commerce (Buy)

FSN E-Commerce Ventures’ (Nykaa) pre-quarter business update for Q2-FY27 suggests continued growth momentum in top line, with consolidated GMV expected to grow around 30 per cent while NSV growth is expected to be higher in the early 30s. Consolidated net revenue growth is likely to be in the late 20s. The beauty business continued to deliver healthy NSV growth of late-20s y-o-y, ahead of JMFe of mid 20s despite a difficult base of festive spends starting early last year. The strong quarter was supported by robust customer acquisition as well as repeat orders, sustained traction in House of Nykaa brands and LFL store sales growth of early 20s. Fashion too continued its solid performance as NSV growth is expected to be in the late-40s y-o-y, significantly ahead of JMFe of mid 30s on the back of new customer additions, assortment expansion and continued traction in Nike partnership. With both businesses continuing to scale well, we expect operating leverage to remain favourable, supporting another quarter of healthy earnings delivery. While the business had delivered similar growth trends in Q1 as well, it is worth noting that the base for Q2 was tough because of shift in festive spends to Q3 this yea whereas last year spends had started in Q2 itself. This in turn also augurs well for Q3-FY27. We maintain our estimates but roll-forward to Sep’27E for a revised TP of ₹405 (earlier ₹395); maintain Buy. Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments. We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

Broker’s call: FSN E-Commerce (Buy)
Europe
BBC Business

OpenAI scraps rollout of new model over safety concerns

OpenAI will not release its new AI model - GPT-6.1 Astra - due to safety concerns, the ChatGPT-maker confirmed on Tuesday. The AI system - which performs tasks like browsing the web and using apps by itself - "didn't quite meet the bar" of the company's standards, Saachi Jain, head of safety systems at OpenAI, said. On Tuesday, OpenAI also issued an update on incidents, that occurred in June but were not made public until last week, in which its models accessed Australian government websites and systems without authorisation. Those incidents and similar breaches by models developed by major AI firms have in recent weeks intensified the debate around the risks posed by the technology. Top AI leaders including OpenAI's Sam Altman and Anthropic boss Dario Amodei have urged the industry to slow the pace of development due to concerns about risks associated with the technology. OpenAI's decision, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, is a rare instance of a major AI developer pulling a new release over safety concerns. The model fell short in terms of "staying within scope and authorisation, and how it communicates back to the user about the type of work it's done," Jain said. "We want to make sure our model development is safe no matter whether that's in the company, or when we ship it to users. But when we ship it to users, we have an extremely high bar in terms of safety and alignment," she added. The flagship GPT-6 Astra agentic model was released in September and specialises in complex reasoning and executing tasks autonomously. OpenAI said it was the result of "years of research and big bets". OpenAI is set to hold its annual DevDay developer conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, where it is expected to make several announcements. It is unclear if a new version of Astra will be among them. The company's security controls have come under intense scrutiny after several high-profile incidents involving its technology. Last week, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that a rogue OpenAI agent had hacked into government websites and systems in June in what experts said was the first known case of its kind in the world.

OpenAI scraps rollout of new model over safety concerns