Europe
BBC Business

UK electric car sales target set to be weakened

The UK government is set to water down its target for how many new cars that are sold need to be electric vehicles (EVs). Under the current rules, 80% of all new cars sold in the UK need to be EVs by 2030, but car makers and trade unions have been lobbying government for years to reduce the target because of concerns over costs and jobs. Meanwhile, sustainability groups say any weakening of the target will threaten the UK's long-term electrification and climate goals. The government will hold a consultation on what the new 2030 target should be, meaning it could take months before it is decided, but numbers ranging from 50% to 70% are under consideration. A ban on sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030 was first announced by former prime minister Boris Johnson in 2020 and pushed back to 2035 by Rishi Sunak when he was prime minister. Alongside this change, Sunak introduced phased targets for EV sales in the UK, known as the Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) mandate. Under the ZEV mandate, the percentage of new car sales that need to be EVs increases each year. The target was 28% for 2025, 33% for 2026, and so on until it reaches 80% by 2030. Labour has pledged in its manifesto to bring the petrol and diesel ban back to 2030. Meanwhile, a policy review on the separate ZEV mandate had been expected early next year but the industry has pushed for it to happen sooner. Downing Street is expected to meet with the UK car industry this week to discuss the shift in policy, which was first reported by the Sunday Times. Labour has previously accused the Conservative government of "moving goalposts on phase out dates". Companies that fail to hit the ZEV mandate face a fine of £15,000 per car. They also have the option of buying credits from rivals who have sold more electric cars than they needed to. To sell their quota of EVs, many car makers use discounts. This has cost the industry more than £10bn over the past two years, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT). The SMMT told the BBC that "unless there is urgent relief of the mandate, which is still running well ahead of demand and about to ramp up, then the cost will be in jobs, investments and the viability of some businesses".

UK electric car sales target set to be weakened
North America
CNBC Finance

Elon Musk becomes world's first trillionaire as SpaceX begins trading on the Nasdaq

With SpaceX opening on the Nasdaq at $150 a share Friday, the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla now has a stake in SpaceX that's worth more than $766 billion. Combined with his Tesla stake, which is worth $280 billion, Musk's net worth from both companies as of Friday was roughly $1.05 trillion. The SpaceX IPO added more than $180 billion to Musk's fortune. He is now worth more than the next five richest billionaires in the world combined. His personal net worth is larger than the national GDP of Taiwan, Ireland or Sweden. Musk's coronation as the first person in history to be worth $1 trillion is likely to add fuel to the debate over wealth inequality and the rise in power of America's richest tech founders. Along with creating the world's first trillionaire, the SpaceX IPO also minted thousands of new millionaires and several new billionaires among the employees and executives who own stock. Shares of SpaceX gained roughly 20% Friday to close just above $160 apiece. That values the company at more than $2 trillion. Musk was first declared a billionaire by Bloomberg and Forbes in 2012, with the latter estimating his net worth at $2.4 billion at the time. His fortune reached $20 billion in 2019 and skyrocketed the following year after a Tesla stock split, making Musk the world's fifth centibillionaire — worth more than $100 billion — by Forbes' estimate. In the six years since, Musk's net worth has grown roughly tenfold. His fortune has surged by a rate unmatched even by the decade's previous "world's richest person" titleholders: Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and Bernard Arnault, head of the luxury empire LVMH. Google co-founder Larry Page, currently worth an estimated $295 billion, according to Forbes, takes a distant second place among the ranks of the world's richest people. Page is followed by a second Google co-founder, Sergey Brin; Bezos, and Oracle founder Larry Ellison, each worth more than $200 billion as of Friday, according to Forbes. That said, Gates' fortune would be a whopping $464 billion had he not given so much away to philanthropy, per Forbes' estimate. Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Elon Musk becomes world's first trillionaire as SpaceX begins trading on the Nasdaq
Europe
The Guardian

Why is the UK launching an ‘Australia plus’ social media ban and how will it work?

The move by Labour follows a consultation with the public looking at ways to reduce harms young people face online. Photograph: Daniel de la Hoz/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenThe move by Labour follows a consultation with the public looking at ways to reduce harms young people face online. Photograph: Daniel de la Hoz/Getty ImagesSocial media banExplainerWhy is the UK launching an ‘Australia plus’ social media ban and how will it work?Government wants to back parents against tech companies though some feel the process has been rushed Keir Starmer is expected to announce sweeping “Australia-plus” restrictions on under-16s accessing harmful social media apps, a move the government has framed as taking the side of parents against the big technology companies. A consultation on online safety closed on 26 May, giving ministers just weeks to come up with policies after receiving more than 116,000 responses. Industry sources and child safety advocates have described the process as “rushed” and driven by a political timeline. It is not clear when the ban could come into force. Key to the ban is one of the thorniest issues in technology regulation worldwide: how can tech companies verify details about their users without invasive measures – such as requiring government-issued IDs? The UK regulator Ofcom offers some flexibility in how age verification is done under the Online Safety Act. That could change under the ban. Starmer is preparing to ban access for under-16s to a number of social media apps – sources close to the process expect this to include all the major social media apps. Currently, the age restriction for major social media platforms is 13 but there is no official government-mandated age limit. He is also expected to announce restrictions for platforms that are not banned, with certain features withheld for under-16s. Those features will include chats with adult strangers and livestreaming. It has also been reported that 16 and 17-year-olds will be set time limits for using social media. Under-18s are also expected to be blocked from using romantic or sexual AI chatbots. The prime minister has been sceptical about introducing a ban. His concerns have included whether such a move would push teenagers on to the dark web or leave them with the “cliff edge” scenario of entering the world of social media at the age of 16 with no experience of how to handle it. However, the introduction of an under-16 ban in Australia has led to a change of heart, having prompted many Labour MPs and some cabinet ministers to push for the UK to do the same. In January, more than 60 Labour MPs wrote to the prime minister calling for a ban. There has also been a steady drumbeat of pressure from safety campaigners for further restrictions, although views on an under-16 ban are mixed within that group. The Molly Rose Foundation, a charity established by the family of Molly Russell, a British teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content, said a ban would be “unenforceable” and “masks the absence of any credible plan to stop childhoods being blighted and young lives lost by out of control algorithms”. Parents support a ban, with nine out of 10 parents who responded to the consultation expressing support for it. The UK already has a legal framework for tackling harmful content, the Online Safety Act, which is overseen by the communications watchdog, Ofcom.

Why is the UK launching an ‘Australia plus’ social media ban and how will it work?
Europe
The Guardian

US justice department approves $111bn merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery

David Zaslav, CEO and president of Warner Bros Discovery (left) in 2025, and the Paramount CEO, David Ellison, in 2026. Composite: The Hollywood Reporter via Getty Images, Zuffa LLCView image in fullscreenDavid Zaslav, CEO and president of Warner Bros Discovery (left) in 2025, and the Paramount CEO, David Ellison, in 2026. Composite: The Hollywood Reporter via Getty Images, Zuffa LLCTrump administrationUS justice department approves $111bn merger of Paramount and Warner Bros DiscoveryDeal still under UK scrutiny with new investigation, and could face lawsuit from state attorneys general Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has decided to approve the $111bn merger of Paramount Skydance, controlled by the Ellison family, and Warner Bros Discovery, the parent company of networks like CNN and HBO. The deal was approved by the justice department’s anti-trust division after months of review, and despite the concerns of many people in the entertainment and media industries who believe it will hurt competition by reducing the number of film studios and – most likely – merging two news networks, Paramount’s CBS News and CNN. “The Division has completed its analysis of the proposed merger of Paramount and Warner Bros and determined based on the evidence received in its investigation that the transaction is not likely to result in harm to competition or American consumers, including with respect to: (1) streaming video on demand (“SVOD”); (2) linear television; and (3) studio development, production, or distribution of films for theatrical release,” the agency said on Friday evening. While the US government’s approval is a major win for the deal, hurdles remain. Earlier this week, the UK competition watchdog opened an investigation into the merger to determine whether it will result in a “substantial lessening of competition” in the UK. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) set a 7 August deadline to determine whether the merger requires a more in-depth review. In addition to reviewing the deal, European regulators are investigating the funding behind the merger; three sovereign-wealth funds in the Gulf have committed a combined $24bn. Both reviews have July deadlines. Paramount denied the lessening of competition in its statement Friday evening: “We are grateful for the Department of Justice’s thorough review of this transaction, as well as the work of the other agencies that have completed their reviews and provided clearance to date. This deal is pro-competitive, resulting in a stronger company better positioned to compete against dominant technology platforms in an industry increasingly defined by intense competition for audiences, talent, technology, and investment. We remain focused on completing the transaction as soon as possible and delivering its benefits to consumers, creators, and the entertainment industry as a whole.” On Tuesday, regulators in Australia approved the deal, after determining that it “is unlikely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in relation to the wholesale supply of films for theatrical release in Australia”, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that listed numerous other countries that have blessed the merger. Journalists at CBS News and CNN have expressed concerns about the possibility of the networks being merged, which would probably entail significant job cuts, as the companies have promised $6bn in synergies from the deal. There is also long-held concern from some staffers at CNN about the possibility of David Ellison and his father Larry, a longtime Trump associate, reorienting the network in an editorial direction more favorable to the president. (David Ellison pledged in March that CNN’s editorial independence would be protected, but there is speculation that he could choose to put CBS News’s embattled editor-in-chief, Bari Weiss, in charge of the cable network.) There is also still a possibility of a coalition of US state attorneys general filing a lawsuit to try to block the merger, something that could reportedly happen in the next few weeks and would probably be led by the California attorney general, Rob Bonta. Bonta, on Friday evening, posted on social media, “The merger of Warner Bros and Paramount is not a done deal and remains under investigation by my office.” Politico first reported that Trump’s justice department had decided to approve the merger. “Over the course of a rigorous eight-month investigation led by the Division’s career staff, the Division received from the Parties over two million documents from over 80 custodians, substantial productions of data, as well as extensive documents, data, and advocacy from third parties across the media and entertainment ecosystem,” the justice department said.

US justice department approves $111bn merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery
Europe
BBC Business

Elon Musk becomes world's first trillionaire as SpaceX soars in stock market debut

Elon Musk on Friday became the world's first trillionaire after shares in his SpaceX rocket company soared during the biggest-ever stock market debut. The Tesla and SpaceX founder comfortably cemented his status as the world's richest man, with his total net worth standing at $1.11tn (£828bn) according to the Bloomberg rich list. It came as the rocket, telecommunications and artificial intelligence (AI) company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange with a value of $2.2tn. The company said its shares would be offered at $135 each, but trading opened at $150 and briefly reached $176.50 in a show of investor enthusiasm for potential business related to space and companies associated with Musk. The initial public offering (IPO) of SpaceX raised $75bn from investors and underwriters of the deal before shares of the company hit the open stock market on Friday. Musk's 42% ownership stake in SpaceX gives him essentially unilateral control over everything it does. He can spend the money being invested however he likes. According to Bloomberg, his shares in SpaceX were worth $767.1bn at close of trade, and he has another $53.8 in SpaceX options. He also has $168bn in Tesla shares, and a further $116.4bn in Tesla options. Musk's status as the world's first trillionaire immediately sparked debate about wealth inequality. His wealth is now similar to the entire economic output of Poland or Switzerland. Such unheard of wealth has already turned Musk into a powerful and divisive figure in global politics. He gave hundreds of millions of dollars to the re-election campaign of US President Donald Trump after criticising the country's leadership, and for several months last year, Musk led the Department for Government Efficiency (Doge). Through drastic cuts to government spending, Musk was responsible for the closure of the US Agency for International Development (USAID). Such cuts could cause more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to a warning published by researchers in the Lancet medical journal.

Elon Musk becomes world's first trillionaire as SpaceX soars in stock market debut
Europe
The Guardian

How much money did Elon Musk make in SpaceX’s stock market debut?

Elon Musk on 19 November 2025. Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenElon Musk on 19 November 2025. Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty ImagesElon MuskExplainerHow much money did Elon Musk make in SpaceX’s stock market debut?He’s now the world’s first trillionaire, after his rocket and AI company broke IPO records on its way to a $2.1tn valuation Elon Musk is now the world’s first trillionaire. SpaceX’s historic debut on the stock market on Friday launched the CEO to unprecedented levels of wealth; his personal fortune now amounts to $1.1tn, an increase of more than $62bn since the previous day, according to Forbes. The rocket, satellite and AI company raised $75bn from its record-breaking initial public offering (IPO), and is now valued at $2.1tn after its first day of public trading. Musk was already the world’s wealthiest person. In the days before SpaceX officially went public, his net worth hit $782bn, dropping by $50bn in one month due to a decline in Tesla’s share price, according to Forbes. However, the figure represents a huge leap from a decade ago, when the tech executive’s net worth hovered around $14bn – and an even bigger jump compared with 15 years earlier, when he was worth just $680m, according to Forbes. It can be hard to conceptualize such exorbitant wealth. To drive home just how much money $1.1tn is: only about 21 countries’ yearly economic output exceeds $1tn. Even Musk’s birthplace isn’t part of that elite club; South Africa’s output of goods and service is closer to $480bn. A trillion dollars is enough to buy 243bn gallons of gasoline. (That’s more than the nearly 137bn gallons Americans used last year.) SpaceX’s stock soared after its debut. At market close, at 4pm ET, its share price was $161, up 19% from its initial price of $135 per share. SpaceX had opened at $150 a share before peaking at $176 at midday. The vast majority of Musk’s money is tied up in stocks and equity, and isn’t available as cash he can quickly spend. His portfolio of companies includes Tesla, the electric car maker, and xAI, the AI startup that was folded into SpaceX earlier this year. Musk’s fortune is unprecedented, not just for its size but the speed at which it grew. “If you look at a graph, it looks like a hockey stick. It’s only in 2020 that his personal net worth truly went bonkers,” says Quinn Slobodian, a history professor at Boston University and the author of Muskism: A Guide for the Perplexed. Around 2020 was when Musk first became the world’s wealthiest person and Tesla the world’s most valuable car company. “Musk has a proven track record in creating sectors out of nothing,” Slobodian says. There’s a sense to “never bet against Elon – he’ll always make you money”, he adds. A few months before SpaceX’s stock market debut, Musk wrapped his AI startup, xAI, into SpaceX in a record-breaking deal. SpaceX has proposed launching up to 1m datacenters into space, as part of its ultimate goal of establishing colonies on the moon and Mars. This lean into AI is what’s allowed Musk to claim such high valuation for SpaceX – because many investors now believe “AI is such a once-in-a-millennium opportunity that it merits these extravagant expectations”, says Mihir Desai, a professor at Harvard Business School. Desai says the space business alone wouldn’t have generated such excitement.

How much money did Elon Musk make in SpaceX’s stock market debut?
North America
CNBC Finance

Rivian CEO taking different approach than Elon Musk for humanoid robotics company

PARK CITY, Utah — Rivian Automotive CEO RJ Scaringe envisions a day in the not-so-distant future when the electric vehicle maker's manufacturing employees will have a new type of colleague: humanoid robots. "There's going to be thousands of people that are collaborating alongside these robots. They're going to be taking pictures, 'Hey, check this out! My co-worker's name is Phil, and he's a robot,'" Scaringe said during a media event for the launch of the Rivian R2 EV. The 43-year-old automotive enthusiast and tech entrepreneur started a robotics company last year called Mind Robotics. The company has raised more than $1 billion, according to Scaringe. Humanoid robots are designed to be shaped and move like people. Artificial intelligence algorithms power their abilities along with complex hardware like semiconductors. Proponents say they could be used in various settings, from factories to hospitality and even in the home, while others have raised concerns about the devices replacing human jobs. Scaringe said the company expects to reveal its first product in less than a year, with Rivian as a large minority shareholder and launch customer. Mind currently has roughly 20 open positions ranging from software and hardware engineers to data architects, according to its website. Scaringe, who is executive chair and acting CEO of Mind, told CNBC that the plan is to keep the robotics company separate from Rivian, as opposed to the automaker partially shifting to make humanoid robots, like Tesla CEO Elon Musk is doing with his company. "We have a deep relationship, and that was actually how we structured it," Scaringe said during an interview. "A big part of structuring the business was to allow me to be able to spend time on both." The robotics strategy adds to a narrative of Scaringe doing things differently than Musk, despite obvious similarities in their companies. There have been enough comparisons that Rivian has even been called the "anti-Tesla" and Scaringe has been referred to as the "anti-Elon." "I'd say there's a lot of alignment there, and I think that's because, obviously, I'm biased, but I think they're right ... that autonomy is a super important technology," Scaringe said about Tesla and Rivian. "But in terms of the products, they, in many ways, couldn't be more different." So far Rivian and Mind are assisting each other, though, much like Musk's companies have also done during developmental phases. That includes Musk's xAI company merging with SpaceX before the company's record-setting initial public offering on Friday as well as SpaceX purchasing vehicles from Tesla. Scaringe said Rivian will be a "huge beneficiary" of Mind, which is using data from Rivian for training its AI models. Along with Rivian's equity stake, the automaker will be Mind's first customer for the robots. "We realized it was such a big opportunity that deserved to be its own company," said Scaringe. He said he believes there is a multitrillion-dollar total addressable market for industrial labor.

Rivian CEO taking different approach than Elon Musk for humanoid robotics company
North America
CNBC Finance

Drugmakers race to find a place in the next wave of obesity drugs

Drugmakers are only months into introducing GLP-1 pills and navigating huge changes in how patients pay for weight-loss drugs. Even so, they're already outlining their visions for the future of obesity drugs. At the American Diabetes Association's Scientific Sessions in New Orleans last week, drugmakers pitched doctors and investors on the idea of new shots and pills, drugs that can be taken less frequently, and new treatments beyond GLP-1s that could come with fewer side effects. The attendees debated where all these new treatments might fit in, especially with Eli Lilly currently dominating the market for shots and impressing attendees with data from its experimental triple-acting drug retatrutide that produced the most weight loss seen yet. Lilly and rival Novo Nordisk showcased new GLP-1 pills they each introduced earlier this year. Both companies made the case that oral options are bringing more people into the market for weight loss drugs, with Novo touting that prescriptions of its Wegovy pill reached more than 3 million just five months into the launch. Behind the two market leaders are a wave of new entrants hoping to get into the massive market in the coming years. Structure Therapeutics and AstraZeneca each shared mid-stage data from their respective GLP-1 pills. Should those oral drugs succeed in Phase 3 trials, they would likely come to the market around 2029, three years behind Lilly, which introduced its small molecule pill Foundayo earlier this year (the Wegovy pill is an oral peptide). Structure Therapeutics CEO Ray Stevens thinks there will still be plenty of room in the market by then. "Who wins at the end of the day with competition? Patients, and that's really what this is all about," Stevens said, adding that being the second small molecule drug will be important. "We're really pushing hard to get into that second position behind orforglipron, now Foundayo." Pfizer also unveiled mid-stage data from a shot it gained through its $10 billion acquisition of Metsera. The drug showed the potential to be given monthly, which Pfizer thinks would be more convenient than the currently weekly shots. Another drugmaker, Amgen, is testing a different drug that could be given monthly or possibly even quarterly. Susan Sweeney, Amgen's executive vice president of obesity and related conditions, said the company sees an advantage in people not needing to take a weekly injection and instead thinking about treatment as little as four times a year. "For somebody who's lived with obesity for a long time, it can be a major advantage in not remembering your disease," she said. Some companies are looking beyond GLP-1 and other hot targets like GIP and glucagon to emerging areas like amylin, another hormone produced in the pancreas that helps people feel full. One company is Zealand Pharma, which presented mid-stage data from a drug called petrelintide that it's developing with Roche.

Drugmakers race to find a place in the next wave of obesity drugs
Asia-Pacific
The Straits Times

Traders are most positive on US dollar since February 2025

The positioning signals a build-up in bullish sentiment for the currency, as the US-Iran war supports its status as a haven. NEW YORK – Traders turned the most optimistic on the US dollar in more than a year as the war in the Middle East supports the currency’s status as a haven. Hedge funds, asset managers and other speculators accumulated US$27.8 billion (S$35.7 billion) worth of bets that the dollar will strengthen as at June 9, according to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) data released on June 12 and compiled by Bloomberg. It is the most since February 2025. The positioning signals a build-up in bullish sentiment for the world’s primary reserve currency, which has risen since the war broke out in late February, showing a strong sensitivity to a surge in oil prices. A Bloomberg gauge of the dollar is up about 1.6 per cent since the US and Israel attacked Iran, also supported by haven buying and strong US economic data. “The fundamental picture continues to point in the bullish direction for the dollar,” said Alex Cohen, a foreign-exchange strategist at Bank of America. Speculative traders have been holding bets on a stronger US currency for the past 13 weeks, according to the CFTC data. That marked a shift from before the war, when traders had about US$22 billion of wagers tied to a weaker greenback. The CFTC’s figures offer investors a glimpse into sentiment in the US$9.5-trillion-a-day foreign exchange market, showing how hedge funds and asset managers are positioned using derivatives. In the latest data, leveraged funds also boosted their negative bets on the Japanese yen to the most since 2017. That positioning comes as the currency trades around 160 versus the dollar, a level seen earlier this year when Japanese officials intervened to support it. BLOOMBERG

Traders are most positive on US dollar since February 2025